USPTO serial 79042991
3FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3602629Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Essen, DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Bromaghim
Peter Bromaghim Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Blvd.7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Pipeline systems, namely, fittings for pipes and branching tubes of metal for pipelines, pipes of metal and connecting elements of metal, namely, fittings, namely, tees, elbows, adaptors, reducers, stop pieces made of copper, bronze, brass and stainless steel [ ; water pipes of metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ Water supply installations, namely, drinking water installations, taps and fittings, namely, valves for water supply and gas apparatus and for water and gas pipes; pipes being parts of heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and water supply apparatus and sanitary apparatus and installations ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Non-metal connecting elements, namely, fittings, namely, tees, elbows, adaptors, reducers and stop pieces for pipes, pipelines and flexible pipes [ ; goods of plastics, namely, mounting accessories, namely, clips; flexible pipes, not of metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | [ Residential plumbing and heating pipes, not of metal, for building; branch pipes, not of metal; drainage pipes, not of metal; outlet pipes, not of metal; ] fittings for pipes and pipelines, not of metal [ ; water pipes, not of metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANHA GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- Other trademarks owned by Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- Other trademarks owned by Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named 3FIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |