Drawing for DICON

USPTO serial 79042996

DICON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Conveyor systems, in particular belts and braces for conveyors; mechanical conveyors including those having curve parts; mechanical link conveyors and parts thereof, namely continuous or segmented conveyor belts of rubber or plastic; conveyor links in plate, trough or box form of metal as parts of belt conveyors; escalators and parts thereof, namely stepsACTIVE—
035Rental and providing of information and/or advertising spaces; structuring and conducting advertising initiativesACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and/or repair of advertising equipment such as advertising columns, billboards, stationary or moving belts, luggage conveyors; installation, maintenance and/or repair of luggage conveyorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance