Drawing for MIESZKO CHERRISSIMO

USPTO serial 79043065

MIESZKO CHERRISSIMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728461Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIESZKO CHERRISSIMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

William J. Seiter Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, rice, tapioca, sago, flour, candies, chocolates, sweets, ice cream, honey, molasses, yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, iceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 1, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 25, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 22, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 20, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance