USPTO serial 79043067
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, trousers; footwear; headwear, sportswear and leisurewear, namely sweat pants, sweaters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, boxing and weight training equipment in the nature of boxing bags, gloves, pads, head and mouth guards, hand wraps and jumping ropes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NOPM | NOTICE OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT MANUALLY TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |