Drawing for HIDROMEK

USPTO serial 79043069

HIDROMEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488956Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HIDROMEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Bulldozers, mechanical shovels, namely, power shovels, earth moving machines, namely, excavators, rock drilling machines, power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, loaders, backhoe loaders, fork liftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 5, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 14, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 31, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance