USPTO serial 79043072
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. TENER
DAVID M. TENER Caesar Rivise, PC500 Office Center DriveSuite 400Fort Washington, PA 19034| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Goods for electronic systems, namely, embedded systems, namely, computer hardware, operating system firmware for operating embedded systems and operating system software for operating data processing systems, namely, embedded systems comprised of serial data bus hardware, serial data bus operating software, serial data bus operating firmware; electronic hardware systems, namely, computer hardware for emulating embedded systems and testing related software, particularly in connection with peripheral devices for computers, and communication systems using electronic communication protocols, particularly in connection with peripheral devices for computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Organization of training courses and seminars concerning software development in the field of computer networking and embedded systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of computer hardware, firmware, and software for data processing systems, measuring systems, and communication systems, namely, in connection with peripheral devices for computers; design and maintenance of computer software operating systems used in connection with computer hardware, firmware, and software for data processing systems, measuring systems, and communication systems, namely, in connection with peripheral devices for computers; updating of software for operating systems used in connection with computer hardware, firmware and software for data processing systems, measuring systems and communication systems, namely, in connection with peripheral devices for computers for others; planning the construction of electronic hardware, namely, design, and development of computer hardware and software in relation to integrated circuits and printed circuits for the hardware, firmware and software for data processing systems, measuring systems using electronic communication protocols for testing electronic hardware and related software, particularly in connection with peripheral devices for computers, and communication systems using electronic communication protocols, particularly in connection with peripheral devices for computers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |