USPTO serial 79043098
M1PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3520794Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with M1PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. STRIKER
MICHAEL J. STRIKER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and computer programs for use in connection with knitting machines, namely, for creating different stitch patterns and designs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |