Drawing for MONSTER ALLERGY

USPTO serial 79043162

MONSTER ALLERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER ALLERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Gamson

Robert Gamson Hodes, Pessin & Katz, P.A.901 Dulaney Valley RoadSuite 400Towson, MD 21204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages; and preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit juices and soft drinksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 12, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 27, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 23, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 22, 2011LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 5, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 11, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 11, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 7, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 14, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance