Drawing for JS CABLE

USPTO serial 79043167

JS CABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3480947Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 5, 2008
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JS CABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samuel Digirolamo

Samuel Digirolamo Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Fiber-optic cables; bare wires; power cables; electricity winding wires; cables for receiving, transmitting cable television signals; electric wires and fibers for sound, image transmission; coaxial cables; cables for transmission of electrical or optical signals; electric cables; ducts for electric cables; sheaths for electric cables; junction sleeves for electric cables; electric wires and cables; electrical ducts; identification sheaths for electric wires; telegraph wires; telecommunications cables; covered wires; extended cablesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 1, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 16, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 16, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 5, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance