Drawing for MEC PLASTICS

USPTO serial 79043174

MEC PLASTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3567849Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 2009
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEC PLASTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, and parts thereof, namely, handlebars for motorcycles, front and rear mudguards, covers for motorcycle gas tanks and radiator shrouds, number-bearing side door panels for land vehicles, front number-bearing hatch boards, license plate holders, motorcycle handle bar grips, brake-disk covers, license plate frame protectors, all for motorcycles; motorcycle handle bar dampers made of expanded materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 18, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 28, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 28, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 7, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance