USPTO serial 79043205
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Vacuum pumps; spare parts for vacuum pumps, namely, vacuum tubes, connectors, flanges, valves, slide valves, traps, condensation traps, separators, filters, supports, stop cocks, gaskets and mounting devices ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Physical and chemical laboratory apparatus made of glass and of artificial materials, for dosing, pipetting, titrating, transferring, tempering, stirring, mixing, diluting, concentrating and separating of fluids, namely, graduated, manual, motorized and automatic pipettes; measuring cylinders for measuring volume; volumetric flasks for laboratory use; beakers; flasks for laboratory use; [ Erlenmeyer flasks for laboratory use; ] dispensers, namely, manual, motorized and automatic hand-held, non-refrigerated and non-heated liquid dispensers and pipettes; bottle-top dispensers, namely, manual, [ motorized and ] automatic bottle top burettes for laboratory use; laboratory glassware in the nature of [ wash bottles; ] manual, motorized and automatic machines for dispensing pre-determined volumes of liquid; laboratory glassware, namely, burettes; laboratory equipment in the nature of apparatus to help filling pipettes, namely, manual and motorized pipette controllers; pipette fillers, pipette pumps, pipette racks, storing pipette trays, pipette cleaning jars, and pipette holders; dispensing aids in the nature of apparatus for dispensing pre-determined dosages of various liquids and suspensions used in a laboratory, namely, machines for dispensing pre-determined dosages of liquids and suspension; multi-purpose dosing instruments in the nature of apparatus for dispensing pre-determined dosages of chemicals for laboratory use, namely, machines for dispensing pre-determined dosages of chemicals; tempering apparatus in the nature of laboratory crucibles and laboratory glassware; stirring apparatus, namely, [ stirring thermometers, stirring propellers, ] magnetic stirring bars, and stirring sticks for laboratory use; [ laboratory apparatus, namely, centrifuges; as well as computer software for the control, operation, user interface and calibration of aforesaid laboratory apparatus; ] physical and chemical laboratory apparatus made of glass and of artificial materials, namely, apparatus for sample-distribution, marking and identification in the nature of tubes, containers, vessels with attached or printed identification tabs like bar-codes and specific batch or individual product numbers, as well as computer software for the control, operation, user interface and calibration of aforesaid laboratory apparatus; physical and chemical laboratory apparatus made of glass and of artificial materials, namely, micro-plates, micro arrays in the nature of plates having micro multi-well arrays for chemical analysis or patterning for scientific and medical research, cuvettes, frames and filter plates in various well configurations for standard, HTS/UHTS applications in the nature of cell culture, colorimetric assays, fluorescence assays and luminescence assays; Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) plates for laboratory use; deep-well plates for laboratory use; microtube racks for laboratory use; micro arrays, namely, plates having micro multi-well arrays for chemical analysis or patterning for scientific and medical research; [ and Lab-on-a-chip plates, namely, plates or holding devices that integrate multiple laboratory functions in computer chip format that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific, laboratory or medical research use; ] as well as covers and closure mats for all aforementioned products; physical and chemical laboratory apparatus made of glass and of artificial materials, namely, cuvettes, sample storage containers, reaction containers, pipette tips, and syringe-like parts for pipetting apparatus, all those goods disposable; physical and chemical laboratory apparatus made of glass and of artificial materials, in the form of auxiliary instruments and articles for handling of liquids and solid materials, namely, scoops, spatula, pincers, funnels, sampling containers, trays, carriers and holders for sample storing containers and tip-boxes [ ; thermometers ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |