USPTO serial 79043304
CAOZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3547030Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2008
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAOZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sofer
JOSEPH SOFER SOFER & HAROUN LLPSuite 1301215 Lexington AveNEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education, namely, providing educational and instructional services for children and teens in the field of health and behavior and provided through the use of media, namely, films, television, computer games and the Internet; entertainment, namely, production of cable television programs, production of closed caption television programs, production of radio and television programs; television production, cinematographic productions, production of movies for cinema | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |