Drawing for READER SERVICE SIGNAL

USPTO serial 79043330

READER SERVICE SIGNAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READER SERVICE SIGNAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE F. HOFF

CATHERINE F. HOFF MAYBACK & HOFFMAN, P.A.5722 S FLAMINGO RD. #232FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33330UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic transmitters and receivers; radio transmitters, radio receivers; electronic measuring apparatus for radio transmitters and radio receivers; apparatus for networks of transmitters and receivers, for electronic reading devices; radio signal transmitters and radio signal receivers, antennae, antennae networks; radio frequency identification systems; radio sensor networks; systems for the automatic identification and localization of objects; transponders (communication, localization and monitoring device); electronic labels (tags), wireless sensorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 1, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance