Drawing for NATURELLA

USPTO serial 79043356

NATURELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3520798Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 21, 2008
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo M. Loughlin

Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sugar-free confectionery; sugar-free candy and chewing gum; all the aforesaid goods intended for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Confectionery; candy and chewing gum; sugar-free candy and chewing gum; all the aforesaid goods not intended for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 28, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 22, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 22, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 4, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 14, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 21, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance