USPTO serial 79043384
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TOULOUSE, FR
F-31200 TOULOUSE, FR
F-31200 TOULOUSE, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sofer
Joseph Sofer Ipsilon USA, LLP215 Lexington Ave.Suite 1301NEW YORK, NY 10016| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used in database management and decision support systems for the airline and aerospace industry; computer software for planning airline crews; computer programs for scheduling crews and tracking activities; computers and computer peripherals; apparatus, instruments and equipment for recording transmitting, and reproduction of data, namely, radio transmitters, flight data recorder, flight servers in the nature of computer servers, electronic flight bags in the nature of laptop or personal digital assistant computer; apparatus, instruments and equipment for data processing, namely, data processors; modems [ ; magnetic or electronic recording media, namely, blank audio tapes, blank magnetic disks, and blank optical disks ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business organization and management consulting business management consultancy human resources consulting, personnel management consultation, assistance in management of business activities, namely, in planning of airplane crews, computer file management, compilation of data in databases, systemization of information into computer databases, assistance in distribution and organization of personnel, namely, personnel management; personnel planning service, namely, personnel placement and recruitment; preparation of planning for airline crews, namely, wage payroll preparation | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | [ Air transport services, ] consultation in the field of air transport | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software design and development, maintenance of computer software, installation of computer software, updating of computer software for others, rental of computer application software, computer programming, computer software consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |