USPTO serial 79043423
BODYGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3512726Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BODYGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Luepke
Marcus Luepke Muncy Geissler Olds Lowe, P.C.4000 LEGATO RD STE 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ working machines for the building industry and for the building material industry, namely, vibration and oscillation machines for soil compaction and asphalt compaction, machine vibration and oscillation devices for soil compaction and asphalt compaction, motor driven vibration and oscillation tools for soil compaction and asphalt compaction; power operated tools, namely, motor driven hammers, drilling machines, hammer drills, rammers, and tampers; machines for soil compaction and asphalt compaction, namely, rollers and plates; pumps for clean water and dirty water to add and remove water from construction sites; cutting devices and joint cutting devices, namely, cutting devices for asphalt and concrete; machine concrete flat pans, namely, concrete impeller flat pans, power trowels, and stripping devices; electric power generators ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | electric safety modules in cables; electric fuses in supply lines; remote controls, namely, radio controls, infrared remote controls and combinations thereof for remote control of electric switches and control units for controlling construction machines and electric tools; electric switches and control units for controlling construction machines and electric tools, namely, frequency and voltage converters; safety equipment for prevention of electric shocks with electro-mechanical tools, namely, voltage surge suppressors and voltage surge protectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wacker Neuson SE
- Other trademarks owned by Wacker Construction Equipment AG
- Other trademarks owned by Wacker Construction Equipment AG
- Other trademarks owned by Wacker Construction Equipment AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BODYGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |