Drawing for PIANISTA PRODUCT OF POLAND

USPTO serial 79043525

PIANISTA PRODUCT OF POLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIANISTA PRODUCT OF POLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033VodkaABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 1, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 26, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 22, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jan 22, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 18, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 17, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance