USPTO serial 79043560
ZETA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3767507Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZETA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NETZSCH Premier Technologies, LLC
US
Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
Selb, DE
Other trademarks owned by Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrically operated machines, namely, agitator bead mills and structural parts therefore for use in processing low to highly viscous products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NETZSCH Premier Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- Other trademarks owned by Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- Other trademarks owned by Erich Netzsch GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- Other trademarks owned by Netzsch-Feinmahltechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ZETA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |