USPTO serial 79043604
WEBPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment and computers; computer networks; communications networks; computer software; applications software for use by commercial organisations; downloadable information, images, video, audio-visual material, music, entertainment and instructional material supplied on-line from a database or the Internet or via any other communication network; audio and video tapes and disks; compact disks; CD-ROMS; DVDs; data media; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed matter; instructional and teaching material; educational materials in printed form; teaching plans; training material; printed publications; books; newsletters; magazines; drawings; reports and information papers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; provision of access to electronic communication networks and the Internet and extranets; provision of access to a communications network to allow organisations to collaborate and exchange information; provision of access to a communications network that links together organisations including educational establishments, community groups, commercial organisations, theatres, arts and entertainment organisations; message boards and other telecommunications services to facilitate online communication and collaboration between organisations; email-services; providing electronic bulletin board services; providing user access to the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training; entertainment and cultural activities; providing arts education training programmes; providing training in the use of technology; providing access to theatre productions; providing on-line electronic publications (non-downloadable); information relating to entertainment or education, provided on-line from a computer database or the Internet; publishing by electronic means; provision of training and education in areas including theatre production, plays, sketches, drama, arts and entertainment; provision of training plans; online publishing; provision of educational, recreation and entertainment information; arranging and conducting workshops; arranging and conducting seminars; arranging and conducting conferences; organization of exhibitions for entertainment, cultural or educational purposes; organisation of shows; theatre production; production of shows including for theatre, television and radio | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing search engines for the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |