USPTO serial 79043609
HAMATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3540481Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2008
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAMATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for manufacturing substrates, namely, semi-conductor substrates, silicon chips, wafers and photo masks, compact-discs, audio-CD, CD/DVD-ROM, CD-R, DVD, DVD-RAM and laser discs; machines for wet-chemical treatment of substrates, namely, semi-conductor substrates silicon chips, wafers and photo masks, compact-discs, audio-CD, CD/DVD-ROM, CD-R, DVD, DVD-RAM and laser discs; automatic machines for processing, namely, cleaning, lacquering, developing, etching and stripping, substrates, namely, semi-conductor substrates, silicon chips, wafers and photo masks, compact discs, audio-CD, CD/DVD-ROM, CD-R, DVD, DVD-RAM and laser discs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | installation of mechanical apparatus and instruments for the manufacture of substrates; installation of machines and equipment for wet-chemical treatment of substrates; installation of automatic apparatus and equipment for cleaning, lacquering, developing, etching and stripping substrates, and for manufacturing optical discs; procedural optimization, namely, installation and maintenance of mechanical apparatus and instruments for the manufacture of substrates, of machines and equipment for wet-chemical treatment of substrates, of automatic apparatus and equipment for cleaning, lacquering, developing, etching and stripping substrates and for manufacturing optical discs, for use in connection with setting the procedural parameters for obtaining high quality discs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |