Drawing for ATLANTIC

USPTO serial 79043648

ATLANTIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3516647Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 14, 2008
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATLANTIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha G. Gentner

Marsha G. Gentner Jacobson Holman Pllc400 Seventh Street, NW6th FloorWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vacuum cleanersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 16, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 15, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 14, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 8, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance