Drawing for YELLOW MOUNTAIN

USPTO serial 79043656

YELLOW MOUNTAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3537242Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 25, 2008
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YELLOW MOUNTAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

Laurel V. Dineff DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 10, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 21, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 26, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance