USPTO serial 79043664
ILLUXO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3567851Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2009
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ILLUXO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hoechst, AT
MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin & Marcus PA875 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Furniture hardware primarily of metal, namely, hinges, and door flap stays | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus and devices for lighting, namely, lights and lamps for mounting in furniture pieces, for use with electric light bulbs, fluorescent lighting tubes, halogen light bulbs and LED light bulbs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Ornamental hardware of plastic, wood or combinations thereof, namely, hinges, door flap stays and drawer slides ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRASS GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by MEPLA-Werke Lautenschläger GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ILLUXO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |