Drawing for BOTANIC

USPTO serial 79043665

BOTANIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTANIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben Natter

Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Raw fibers, namely, cellulose fibers for textile use; chemical fibers for textile use in particular of cellulose and further in particular of regenerated and/or non-derivatised man-made celluloseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
023Yarns and threads for textile use in particular of cellulose and further in particular of regenerated and/or non-derivatised man-made celluloseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 2, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance