Drawing for TSE CONSULTING

USPTO serial 79043671

TSE CONSULTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TSE CONSULTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business organization and management consultancy; professional business consulting; consulting on commercial management and administration of sport; market study in the field of sports management; expert expert reports in the field of commercial management of sportSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Organization and conducting of conferences, seminars, conventions in connection with sports; organization of sports eventsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 19, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 17, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance