USPTO serial 79043701
DUAL TREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3570172Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2009
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUAL TREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Erenburg
ANNA ERENBURG CADWALADER WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLPONE WORLD FINANCIAL CENTERNEW YORK, NY 10281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather; animal skins and hides; trunks; chests, namely, travel trunks; suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips and saddlery; saddle trees being saddlery; fastenings for saddles being saddlery; belly bands being saddlery; riding saddle underpads, namely, saddle blankets and sheets; bridles, namely, harnesses; stirrup bars; stirrup leathers; stirrups; horse collars, horse blankets, covers for horse saddles, saddle pads for horses, horse halters, riding saddles; harness for animals, riding crops, bits for harnessing animals, harness blinkers for animals, reins; gaiters, namely, leg bands, protective and jumping boots for horses; rugs and apparel for horses in the nature of saddlery; protectors and coverings designed for horse hoofs, namely, hoof guards and boots for horses | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, trousers, leggings, tee-shirts, polo shirts, jumpers, socks, wind resistant jackets, blouson jackets, competition jackets; footwear, except orthopedic footwear; headwear; boots, half-boots; gloves, belts; gaiters; ties, scarves | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SELLERIE DE NONTRON
- Other trademarks owned by SELLERIE DE NONTRON
- Other trademarks owned by CWD France - Sellerie de Nontron
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DUAL TREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |