Drawing for CLECIM POWER 6HI

USPTO serial 79043707

CLECIM POWER 6HI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580645Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLECIM POWER 6HI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd Hardy

NEIL F. GREENBLUM; TODD HARDY GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACERESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Rolling mills for metal bands; rolling mill structural parts; rolling mill rollers being structural parts of rolling mills; rolling mills motors and drive systems, namely, motors, variable-speed reducers and gear boxes; machine tool spindles for rolling mills; mechanical devices for setting rolling mills, namely, vertical and horizontal adjusting rolling mills roll positioner being structural parts of rolling mills, bending devices for rolling mills rolls being structural parts of rolling millsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Control and regulation devices for rolling mills, namely, electrical controllers to control thickness, flatness, profile of the metal band; electrical controllers for rolls speed and drive motor control; computer programs for rolling mills control and regulationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 25, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 25, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 14, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 14, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance