USPTO serial 79043736
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Nipper
Stephen M. Nipper Colby Nipper PLLC291 E. Shore Dr., Suite 200Eagle, ID 83616UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |