USPTO serial 79043744
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet G. Ricciuti
Janet G. Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC1830 S Street NWWashington, DC 20009UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Computer software for the analysis of data collected by probes analyzing the characteristics of the skin; ] electronic and microelectronic components, namely, microchips; [ optical, measuring, checking instruments, namely, physiological sensors for hydration, trans-epidermal water loss, temperature, pigmentation depth and roughness, pressure modulus, ] pressure regulators, all these goods for scientific and industrial use; electric switchers [, electric transformers, electric accumulators, electric regulators, electric flow controllers; analysis apparatus for non medical use composed of pressure sensors and/or picture sensors; electronic data processors; computers; computer screens ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [ Optical, ] measuring, checking instruments, namely, physiological sensors for hydration, [ trans-epidermal water loss, temperature, pigmentation depth and roughness, pressure modulus, ] pressure regulators, all these goods for medical use [ ; analysis apparatus for medical and dermatological use, namely, dermatological probe, apparatus analyzing the characteristics of the skin ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing training in the electronic, microelectronic and nanotechnological fields | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research services in the field of electronic, microelectronic and nanotechnology, medical and dermatological research; engineering services; research and development of new products for others [, methods for data acquisition and methods for computer data analysis in the field of electronic, microelectronic and nanotechnology ] ; technical consultation in the electronic, microelectronic and nanotechnological fields [ ; computer programming ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |