Drawing for DIGITAL WAVEGUIDE TOUCH

USPTO serial 79043762

DIGITAL WAVEGUIDE TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3818412Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2010
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL WAVEGUIDE TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic touchscreens for cell phones, personal digital assistants, handheld games, GPS devices, digitizer tablets, automatic teller machines, point-of-sale kiosks, remote controls, portable music players, control panels for industrial equipment, and car navigation and control systems; computer touchscreens; video display monitors equipped with touchscreens; electrical and electronic goods containing touch screens, namely, cell phones, personal digital assistants, personal computers, laptops, handheld games, GPS devices, digitizer tablets, automatic teller machines, point-of-sale kiosks, remote controls, portable music players, control panels for industrial equipment, and car navigation and control systems; electrical and electronic controllers for use with touchscreens; computer software for touchscreen controllers and computer programs for touchscreen controllers; accessories for the aforementioned goods, namely, optical components, light guide plates, lenses, and reflectors; component parts for all the aforementioned goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 23, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 17, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 7, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2010CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 22, 2010EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance