USPTO serial 79043764
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa
Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007-5109| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the food industry, chemicals for use in the pharmaceutical industry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |