Drawing for REFERENCEMENT.COM

USPTO serial 79043856

REFERENCEMENT.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFERENCEMENT.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Referencing services, namely, Providing an on-line computer web site that provides reference information; online marketing and advertising; advertising services, namely, promoting the products and services of others via telecommunications and the internetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Press information agency services, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations; leasing access time to a database server center, namely, telecommunications access servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Industrial research in the field of search engines and marketing; computer programming servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 5, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 21, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 29, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance