USPTO serial 79043866
GLEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3505522Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-41018 SAN CESARIO SUL PANARO (MO), IT
I-41018 SAN CESARIO SUL PANARO (MO), IT
SAN CESARIO SUL PANARO (MO), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
Mark Lebow Ladas & Parry LLP1727 King Street, Suite 105Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Electric kitchen machines, namely, standing mixers; dishwashers; clothes washing machines; electromechanical beverage preparation machines, namely, aerated beverage making machine; electric food blenders for household purposes; centrifuges, being machines; electric machines and apparatus for cleaning, namely, carpet cleaning machines; electric mincing machines for household purposes; plywood drying machines; kneading machines for preparing bread; electromechanical food preparation machines, namely, food processors; grating machines for vegetables; electric knives; meat mincer machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Gas cookers; electric cookers; electromagnetic induction cookers for household purposes; ceramic and gas stoves; electric pressure cookers; electric slow cookers; cooking rings, namely, cooktops; domestic cooking ovens, other than for experimental purposes; convection ovens; [ furnaces, other than for experimental purposes; ] hot air ovens; [ roasting apparatus, namely, coffee roasting ovens; ] barbecues; extractor hoods for kitchens; electric hot plates; electric deep fryers; [ electric boilers; electric egg boilers; ] refrigerating machines; refrigerating apparatus, namely, electric refrigerators for household purposes; [ refrigerating display cabinets; refrigerators; electric bread toasters; regulating and safety accessories for gas apparatus, namely, gas regulators; air filtering installations, namely, air filter for domestic use; beverage cooling apparatus, namely, thermoelectric cooler for beverages; electric coffee makers; refrigerated shipping containers; ] freezers; [ shaped fittings for furnaces, namely, head diffusion collars and discs for use in furnaces; ] gas burners for domestic use; brackets sold as a component part of gas burners for domestic use; [ kiln furniture; ] microwave ovens, being cooking apparatus; [ pasteurizers for use in the food industry; refrigerating appliances and installations, namely, refrigerating cabinets containing racks for wine bottles; refrigerating chambers, namely, portable refrigerated rooms; regulating accessories for water supply, namely, metered valves; powered coffee roasters; ] electric food steamer; [ ice machines; ] sinks; faucets; electric cooking hobs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |