USPTO serial 79044077
Serial No. 79044077
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3524357Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 2008
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79044077?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dishes, drinking glasses, decanters, goblets, carafes, bottles sold empty, all-purpose containers of glass, bowls, small bowls, salad bowls, table set comprised of dishes and drinking glasses sets, oil cruets, portable glass and plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goods, containers for cooking foodstuffs, namely, cooking pots, trays, small household and kitchen utensils, namely, graters; glassware articles, namely, glass bowls, porcelain and earthenware, namely, figures, mugs, pots, vases | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |