USPTO serial 79044083
CLEAN-AC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEAN-AC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Patrick SAGE
G. PATRICK SAGE HUESCHEN & SAGE, PLLCKALAMAZOO BUILDING107 WEST MICHIGAN AVENUEKALAMAZOO, MI 49007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soothing and hydrating cosmetic products, namely, skin creams, oils, gels, lotions, milks and emulsions | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical products, namely, soothing and hydrating dermatological products, soothing and hydrating sanitary and skin care products, namely, medicated skin care preparations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIERRE FABRE DERMO-COSMETIQUE,; Société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by PIERRE FABRE DERMO-COSMETIQUE,; Société anonyme
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CLEAN-AC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |