USPTO serial 79044123
LDT LASER DIRECT TESTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3616146Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LDT LASER DIRECT TESTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and/or images; scientific, digital, optical, photographic, electronic, electric, weighing, measuring, adjusting, checking and monitoring apparatus and instruments, namely, sensing and signaling devices for measurement and quality control of materials processing by laser, electronic flow regulator, and instruments for testing the finished electronic products with a view to detect the defects, namely, electronic analyzers and apparatus for testing the finished electronic products for detecting malfunction, quality or safety of the products, electronic analyzers for testing consumer products for the presence of contaminants, and instruments for controlling the efficacy of the printed circuits in using laser beams able to convert the ultra violets of laser into electricity, namely, laser measuring systems and laser testing systems; apparatus and instruments for the transmission of digital data via an electric distribution network, namely, cable broadcast transmission machines and apparatus, apparatus and instruments for testing electrical or electronic elements in the nature of an apparatus and instruments for testing the efficacy of electrical or electronic elements, namely, machines testing the operation and function of electronic systems, microprocessors, chips, at various stages of their manufacturing process, instrumentation used to test and certify new and existing data and voice communication cable and coaxial cable; detection apparatus and instruments for detecting malfunctions and failures in electric and electronic apparatus and elements, namely, UV laser beam for measuring purposes; apparatus and instruments for detecting manufacturing defects in electric interconnecting circuits, in particular printed circuits, electric and electronic circuits, and integrated circuits, printed electronic circuits for apparatus and cards bearing integrated circuits, computer hardware and computer peripherals, computer software for controlling quality and testing the efficacy of electric and electronic apparatus, microprocessors, microcontrollers, television apparatus for projection purposes, telecommunications apparatus, namely, telephones, telephone answering machines, facsimile machines, teleprinter machines, modems, mobile telephones and telephone electrical cables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific, technical and industrial research services for the development of new products; monitoring and testing services for electric and electronic elements, namely, control services of the quality and efficacy of electric or electronic elements, testing or research or machines, apparatus and instruments, technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems, calibration, malfunction and failure detection services, namely, analysis services for electric and electronic apparatus and elements in the nature of computer systems, accreditation services, namely, developing, evaluating, and testing standards for electric and electronic apparatus and elements, for the purpose of accreditation, services for electric and electronic apparatus and instruments systems, namely, testing or research on machines, apparatus and instruments, technical support, namely, monitoring or network systems, calibration, developing, evaluating and testing standards for certification and statements of compliance for electric and electronic apparatus and systems for the purpose of accreditation, design and development of electric and electronic apparatus and instruments, computer hardware and software design and development services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |