USPTO serial 79044182
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cintellate Pty Ltd (ACN 063 776 705)
OSBORNE PARK WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Cintellate Pty Ltd (ACN 063 776 705)
BMS Solutions Pty Ltd; ACN 063 776 705
OSBORNE PARK WA 6017, AU
Other trademarks owned by BMS Solutions Pty Ltd; ACN 063 776 705
BMS Solutions Pty Ltd; ACN 063 776 705
OSBORNE PARK WA 6017, AU
Other trademarks owned by BMS Solutions Pty Ltd; ACN 063 776 705
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
Carole F. Barrett Barrett IP Law201 Spear St., Suite 1100San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Application software, namely, software for managing workflows, and collecting, recording and analyzing data and information in the fields of health management, safety management and environment management; computer software for managing workflows, and collecting, recording and analyzing data and information in the fields of health management, safety management and environment management; computer programs for data processing, being software for data gathering, processing and reporting in the fields of health management, safety management and environment management; computer programs for processing information, being software for health management, safety management and environment management; computer programs for use in project management in the fields of health management, safety management and environment management, which assist in action management, knowledge management, creating procedural checklists, management of project changes, meeting management, scheduling inspections, making self-assessments, conducting audits, and scheduling project-related training; computer programs for use in communications, being software for use in the fields of health management, safety management and environment management, providing functionalities to escalate to-do tasks and action messages by way of automatically generated messaging; computer programs for use in database management, being software for use in the fields of health management, safety management and environment management; none of the above being software used for call centers and call center-related communications | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |