Drawing for ULTIMA

USPTO serial 79044192

ULTIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely loudspeaker; loudspeakerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035AdvertisingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Entertainment, cultural activities, each relating to or in conjunction with loudspeakerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance