Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79044200?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79044200. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns OERLIKON RAMSHIELD?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79044200, the listed owner(s) include: Rheinmetall Air Defence AG, Oerlikon Contraves AG.

What is USPTO serial number 79044200?

Serial number 79044200 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark OERLIKON RAMSHIELD. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of OERLIKON RAMSHIELD?

OERLIKON RAMSHIELD (79044200) currently shows USPTO status code 402 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover OERLIKON RAMSHIELD?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 013. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: OERLIKON RAMSHIELD Serial# 79044200 | status 402; last event DENA | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OERLIKON RAMSHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Apparatus and instruments for measurement and command transmission, namely communication computers, electronic and optical communication instruments and components, namely radar, laser, electro-optics, all of the forgeoing goods for evaluating and transmitting control orders to fire control systems and weapon systems	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—
013	Weapon systems comprising fire-control apparatus and/or cannons; all above-mentioned products of Swiss origin	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 6, 2018	DENA	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED	—
Apr 5, 2018	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
May 4, 2017	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Nov 9, 2013	FINT	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Oct 2, 2013	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Oct 2, 2013	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Oct 2, 2012	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2012	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2011	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 1, 2011	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Oct 1, 2010	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 29, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 29, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 29, 2010	ERSI	TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED	—
Mar 31, 2010	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Mar 23, 2010	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Sep 28, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 18, 2009	CHLD	CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB	—
Apr 23, 2009	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Mar 26, 2009	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Mar 26, 2009	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Mar 25, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 23, 2008	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Sep 23, 2008	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Sep 23, 2008	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jul 10, 2008	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 10, 2008	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 10, 2008	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jun 20, 2008	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jun 20, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 20, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 20, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 20, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Dec 20, 2007	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Dec 20, 2007	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Dec 20, 2007	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Dec 19, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 26, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Oct 25, 2007	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

OERLIKON RAMSHIELD