USPTO serial 79044215
K KOHLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K KOHLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
Barry L. Kelmachter Bachman & LaPointe, P.C.900 Chapel StreetSuite 1201New Haven, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Impression mass for dental purposes, namely, materials for making dental impressions; bite registration material, namely, dental impression materials; insulating mass for the dentistry, namely, dental amalgams; dental relining materials for underlaying dental prosthesis, namely, dental composite materials; dental polyvinylsiloxane impression materials for dental impressions; and dental silicone impression materials for dental impressions | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, dental elevators, luxating elevators with periotome tips, scalers, curettes, scissors, scissors with ceramic coatings, osteotomy instruments, bone mills, bone aspirators, measuring calipers, dental calipers, osteotomes, sinus lift instruments, micro pliers, micro needle holders, micro scissors, and dental impression trays; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopedic articles, namely, orthopedic belts and braces; suture materials; dental apparatus for dental implants, namely, dental elevators, luxating elevators with periotome tips, scalers, curettes, scissors, scissors with ceramic coatings, osteotomy instruments, bone mills, bone aspirators, measuring calipers, dental calipers, osteotomes, sinus lift instruments, micro pliers, micro needle holders, micro scissors; and dental impression trays | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kohdent Roland Kohler Medizintechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Kohdent Roland Kohler Medizintechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named K KOHLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |