Drawing for FATBABY

USPTO serial 79044255

FATBABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FATBABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic audio apparatus and instruments; audio processor; audio mixers; audio consoles, audio speakers, monitor speakers, speakers for computers; amplifiers; sound recording and reproducing apparatus; high fidelity stereo apparatus; cases adapted or shaped to contain MP3 players; parts and fittings for all aforesaidSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance