USPTO serial 79044289
E-SCOOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3602646Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with E-SCOOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
Douglas T. Johnson Miller & Martin PLLC832 Georgia AvenueSuite 1200 Volunteer BuildingChattanooga, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical aids provided by optometrists and persons qualified to carry out eye examinations and to prescribe and supply corrective glasses and contact lenses, namely, optical lenses for use by patients with limited vision because of macular degeneration, glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy, not being sun glasses or ordinary prescription spectacles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Research and design of optical aids, namely, for patients with limited vision because of macular degeneration, glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | [ Optometrists' services, namely, opthalmic and optometry services, and refraction tests, in the fields of macular degeneration, glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy; customizing and fitting of spectacle lenses and frames for patients with limited vision because of macular degeneration, glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy, not being sun glasses or ordinary prescription spectacles ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E-scoop B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by E-scoop B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by E-scoop B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named E-SCOOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |