Drawing for MM MISS MANDALAY

USPTO serial 79044311

MM MISS MANDALAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734329Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MM MISS MANDALAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Meyer

Charles J. Meyer Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, swimwear, lingerie [, maternity swimwear, maternity lingerie ]ACTIVE—
035[ Retail services, namely, online website, mail order and in-store services in connection with clothing, namely, swimwear, lingerie, maternity swimwear, and maternity lingerie ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 5, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 15, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 202071.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 6, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2017CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 6, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 16, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 21, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 6, 2010COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 6, 2010PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 5, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance