USPTO serial 79044331
SMART GAMES KEEP ON PLAYING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3516661Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SMART GAMES KEEP ON PLAYING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan A. McGonigle
Ryan A. McGonigle Hodgson Russ, LLP605 3rd AvenueSuite 2300New York, NY 10158Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, [ baby rattles, toy mobiles, bath buddies, namely, bath toys, water toy drums, water toy xylophone, baby frames, namely, bead and wire toys for babies, wooden toy building blocks, wooden bead machines, namely, wooden board game on which beads must be moved, wooden clown dolls, ] wooden puzzles, [ wooden toy xylodrums, ] balance action skill games, [ plastic building blocks, ] mind challenging games in the form of puzzles, party games, strategy board games [, megalenses, namely, toy magnifying lenses and yo-yo's ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.I.P. SA
- Other trademarks owned by VANDOREN Rolf
- Other trademarks owned by VANDOREN Rolf
- Other trademarks owned by VANDOREN Rolf
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SMART GAMES KEEP ON PLAYING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |