USPTO serial 79044372
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HARTING Electronics; GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by HARTING Electronics; GmbH & Co. KG
HARTING Electronics; GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by HARTING Electronics; GmbH & Co. KG
HARTING Electronics; GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by HARTING Electronics; GmbH & Co. KG
Espelkamp, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Mosier
Stephen B. Mosier Hayes Soloway PC175 Canal StreetMANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrotechnic and electronic apparatus and devices, namely, direct plug-in electrical connections and card edge connectors for contacting circuit boards, for use in the fields of telecommunications, electronics and other industrial surroundings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |