Drawing for IL MIELEACETO

USPTO serial 79044377

IL MIELEACETO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3543790Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 2008
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with IL MIELEACETO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Grow

Michael A. Grow ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[Honey, vinegar, balsamic vinegar,] sauces [, pastry, edible ices, treacle, spices]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 18, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 22, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 22, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 13, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance