USPTO serial 79044382
LUMBERG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4058036Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2011
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LUMBERG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
58579 Schalksmühle, DE
58579 Schalksmühle, DE
58579 Schalksmühle, DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MECHANICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTROPNEUMATIC PROCESSING MACHINES FOR TERMINATION OF CONNECTORS IN INSULATION DISPLACEMENT TECHNIQUES IN THE NATURE OF MACHINES FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND CABLES, SEMIAUTOMATIC PROCESSING MACHINE FOR TERMINATION OF CONNECTORS IN INSULATION DISPLACEMENT TECHNIQUES IN THE NATURE OF MACHINES FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND CABLES, PROCESSING MACHINE FOR TERMINATION OF CRIMP CONTACT SPRINGS CONSISTING OF DRIVING MOTOR AND CRIMP TOOL PNEUMATIC NOTCH PRESSES IN THE NATURE OF MACHINES FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND CABLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | HAND OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, MANUAL TONGS, RATCHET WRENCHES, WIRE CUTTERS AND WIRE STRIPPERS, PULL-OFF TONGS, KNUCKLE JOINT PRESSES IN THE NATURE OF WIRE CRIMPERS, BAR CUTTERS, WIRE CUTTERS BASED ON A KNUCKLE JOINT PRESS, NOTCH PRESSES IN THE NATURE OF CRIMP WRENCHES, NOTCH PRESSES BASED ON A KNUCKLE JOINT PRESS IN THE NATURE OF CRIMP WRENCH SETS ALL FOR MANUFACTURING CONNECTORS AND CABLE SETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lumberg Connect GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lumberg Connect GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lumberg Connect GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lumberg Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named LUMBERG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |