Drawing for VIONTIC

USPTO serial 79044392

VIONTIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3534274Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 18, 2008
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIONTIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microprocessors; semiconductors; chips, namely, integrated circuit chips; integrated circuit boards; software, namely, operating software for integrated circuits, microprocessors, semiconductors, integrated circuit chips and integrated circuit boardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 31, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 11, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 19, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 29, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 31, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 25, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 18, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance