Drawing for KROMI-TOOL-CENTER

USPTO serial 79044418

KROMI-TOOL-CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3587265Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KROMI-TOOL-CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Linderman

JOHN C. LINDERMAN MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STREETCITYPLACE IIHARTFORD, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Precision machine tools, namely, hard metal tools, high speed steel (HSS) tools, carbide tools, ceramic tools, poly crystalline diamond (PCD) tools, diamond-coated and diamond-uncoated tools, and hard metal tools, all for use in the cutting and forming of materials by othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Repair and maintenance of vending machines that automate the storage and dispensing of machine toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Transport, delivery, packaging, and storage of goods, namely, precision machine toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Assembly of automated machine tool storage and dispensing equipment for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technological consultation services in the technology field of machine tools; and designing machine toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 17, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 16, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 8, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 8, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 3, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance