Drawing for RESONANCES

USPTO serial 79044429

RESONANCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505534Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESONANCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dianne Smith-Misemer

Dianne Smith-Misemer Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, massage cosmetics, slimming cosmetics, cosmetics based on products of marine origin, essential oils, incense, massage oils, perfumery, eaux de toilette, hair lotions, dentifrices, parquet floor waxes, polish for furniture and flooring, stain removersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Gloves for massageSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance